(Poster1 Poster2)
Global COE (Center of Excellence) Program E03 updated on Japanese
Yokohama National University
(Division of Natural Environment and Information, Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences)
National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES)
Proposal abstract Members Program Leader: Hiroyuki Matsuda NewsRelease 21stCOE
Basic studies Case studies Proposal of new social systems Meeting Schedule
Postdoctoral Research Positions
(Poster1 Poster2)
In this Global COE program, we hope to contribute to the proper control of ecological risks in the developing nations in Asia. Throughout Asia, ecosystems are being destroyed, and ecosystem services are being significantly degraded, as a result of population growth and economic development.
Toward this goal, we aim to:
1) Analyze and present a vision of international risk management incorporating an Asian perspective into the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
(MA) of the United Nations.
2) Investigate and analyze the ecosystem functions of forest vegetation, soil, and coastal regions of Asia. Present in detail a method for adaptive risk management, including the management of invasive species.
3) Develop and apply a concrete and practical method for risk management for
ecosystem services in the developing nations of Asia. These services include control of pesticides,
fertilizers, and other harmful substances, as well as the advanced usage
of biomass, genetically modified products, and recycling of waste substances.
4) Organize an international network of researchers, municipalities, companies
and citizens in order to connect "basic studies," "application case studies," and the "proposals of a new social system" based on a new policy idea.
5) Establish an international center for human resource development for young
researchers (with training experience described below) on the basis of items 1) to
4) above.
The most common approach to environmental policy appears to differ between Europe and North America. There is a tendency for European policy makers to stress precaution, while Americans focus more on adaptive management. This controversy has in part arisen due to the immaturity of ecological risk analysis, which provides a platform for environmental policy. Specifically, the main reason for disagreement in the international arena is considered to be due to the absence of the following two perspectives: 1) the perspective of adaptive risk management, i.e., that adaptive ex post facto verification is necessary for the precautionary principle and that the adaptive management, when uncertainty is taken into account, inevitably becomes the precautionary adaptive management; and 2) the perspective of developing countries in Asia that the use of ecosystem services inevitably entails ecosystem risk and that policies will require both risks and use of services to co-occur. Natural resource management will likely involve voluntary agreements and customs in addition to legislation, regulatory requirements or other mandatory systems.
Education plan: We intend to cultivate students' creativity to enable them
to work independently in new domains. At the same time, we aim to
1) develop the ability to write the scenario based on an objective analysis and comprehension with a broad perspective;
and
2) launch the International Education Curriculum for Environmental Risk Management (provisional name), with the goal of producing young researchers who can
lead global environmental activities in the future.
The curriculum will emphasize the ability to formulate a broad human network
and to negotiate social activities at home and abroad. We intend to
1) launch a hands-on training program, which will send students overseas, so that they can cultivate experience
in different academic fields, and
2) provide the various economic support system including public recruitment of the COE fellow (DC), dispatching researchers
overseas and inviting them from abroad targeting the students in the doctor
course.
Research plan: We intend to
1) develop an adaptive risk management method and put it into practical application;
2) develop a method to analyze risk trade-offs, in order to comparatively measure risks in different dimensions;
3) make an international comparison of environmental governance and the nature park management system;
4) construct, propose, and apply case studies for evaluation, forecast, and management of the ecosystem risks;
5) investigate and analyze the ecosystem functions in the forest vegetation, soil, and coastal regions of Asia;
6) propose evaluation and management methods regarding biodiversity and
invasive species;
7) propose a technique for assessment of the impact of harmful substances such as fertilizers on the ecosystem, marine products, or water usage,
and use these assessments as the basis for a suitable adaptive management
method;
8) develop/apply techniques to sustain ecosystem services, including social systems that enable recycling and advanced usage of
living resources/waste; and
9) construct/develop an infrastructure for knowledge and information for the environmental science and administration of ecosystem risk management,
based on trust-based relationships with data providers all over the world.
